CAMBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT

1997 Annual Crime Report

BURGLARY


Burglary describes the unlawful entry of a structure to commit a felony or theft. The use of force to gain entry is not required to classify an offense as burglary. Burglary attempts are included in the total.

Type

1996

1997

% Change

Commercial Burglary

221

190

-14.0%

Residential Burglary

570

406

-28.8%

Total

791

596

-24.7%

Burglary is considered a much graver crime than larceny, since it usually involves breaking into someone's home or business. Great diversity exists within the ranks of burglars: a great many are "crude," unrefined thieves who, with little finesse, will smash a window and enter an unoccupied house or building. Because long-term success at burglary involves innovation, risk, and proficiency, the crime is often associated with "professional," master thieves who disable alarm systems and steal oil paintings and oriental rugs.

The latter type of burglar-the professional thief who used to commit 200 to 300 housebreaks per year, many in wealthy residential locations-has become a dinosaur. He has been put out of business by priority prosecution programs, patrol and investigative strategies, and early detection of patterns. The demise of this "one-man crime wave" has caused burglary to plunge 75 percent since 1980 and 59 percent since 1990. It fell 25 percent in the last year alone. The 1997 total is the lowest burglary statistic the Cambridge Police Department has reported since we started measuring crime in the 1960s.

Burglaries in Cambridge are evenly spread throughout the day, with more business breaks occurring at night and on weekends, and more residential breaks occurring during the workday. Seldom does a resident or business owner encounter a burglar, and only very rarely (except in the case of domestic burglaries) does a resident come to harm during a burglary.

For the purpose of analysis, the crime of burglary is divided into two categories: Commercial Burglary and Residential Burglary ("housebreaks").

Commercial Burglary

Commercial burglaries have decreased 14 percent from 1996 and 25 percent from 1995. Twenty-six percent of the 190 commercial burglaries reported in 1997 occurred at retail establishments such as clothing stores, convenience stores, electronics shops, supermarkets, and drug stores. Retail establishments were clearly the biggest benefactors of the drop in commercial burglaries from 1996 to 1997, with a 29 percent decrease. Retail still made up the biggest target category, however.

Another 24 percent of 1997's commercial burglaries occurred at business offices such as research centers, architectural firms, real estate offices, accounting firms, and corporation headquarters. The thieves targeted laptop computers, fax machines, and other expensive office equipment. Burglars hit bars and restaurants in numbers similar to last year, hoping for a share of the day's profits. Schools across the city reported 15 burglaries, and churches showed 10. Construction sites weighed in at 14 burglaries.

Geographically, the Porter Square/North Cambridge business district again showed the highest number of commercial burglaries, though this crime declined in this area by 22 percent. As in 1995 and 1996, several well-publicized patterns appeared on upper Massachusetts Avenue; these patterns will likely continue into 1998.

The Alewife/West Cambridge district was close behind North Cambridge this year, with at least one pattern on Concord Avenue. The Kendall Square/MIT district showed the lowest number of commercial burglaries, though this statistic does not include burglaries on MIT property.

Geographic Breakdown of Commercial Burglaries

Area

1995

1996

1997

Change 96–97

% of Total

East Cambridge/Galleria

22

27

19

-29.6%

10.0%

Kendall Square/M.I.T.

17

13

6

-53.8%

3.2%

Inman Square/Harrington

28

12

19

+58.3%

10.0%

Central Square

28

22

15

-31.8%

7.9%

Cambridgeport/Riverside

35

28

20

-28.6%

10.5%

Bay Square/Upper Broadway

11

7

7

NC

3.7%

Harvard Square

27

21

23

+9.5%

12.1%

Massachusetts Avenue 1500–1900

14

14

10

-28.6%

5.3%

Porter Square/North Cambridge

37

46

36

-21.7%

18.9%

Alewife/West Cambridge

36

31

35

+12.9%

18.4%

Commercial Burglaries in 1997

 

 

Residential Burglary

Residential burglaries, or "housebreaks," have declined 29 percent in the past year and 42 percent since 1995. The crime has never been lower in Cambridge. The traditional summertime burglary pattern, which was once responsible for 200 to 300 breaks a year, has completely disappeared.

Housebreaks are evenly spread throughout the months of the year, and are concentrated in densely packed residential neighborhoods. Generally, the exact time of a residential burglary is unknown; the resident comes home from work or wakes up in the morning to find evidence of the burglary. Of the breaks in which the time of commission could be narrowed down to within eight hours, 60 percent occurred between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.; with the highest concentration between 8:00 a.m.. and noon. Wednesdays and Thursdays were the most concentrated days of the week.

 

Geographic Breakdown of Residential Burglary

Area

1995

1996

1997

Change 96–97

% of Total

East Cambridge

47

39

34

-12.8%

8.4%

M.I.T. Area

5

2

2

NC

0.5%

Inman/Harrington

54

36

27

-25.0%

6.7%

Area 4

106

78

37

-52.6%

9.1%

Cambridgeport

69

68

55

-19.1%

13.5%

Mid-Cambridge

162

126

65

-48.4%

16.0%

Riverside

55

52

35

-32.7%

8.6%

Agassiz

29

25

30

+20.0%

7.4%

Peabody

51

36

35

-2.8%

8.6%

West Cambridge

33

30

24

-20.0%

5.9%

North Cambridge

74

71

55

-22.5%

13.5%

Cambridge Highlands

3

0

0

NC

0.0%

Strawberry Hill

10

9

7

-22.2%

1.7%

Each of the four most saturated neighborhoods-Mid-Cambridge, North Cambridge, Cambridgeport, and Area 4-registered significant decreases in residential burglary in 1997. All other neighborhoods, except Agassiz, showed decreases or, in the case of the two lowest neighborhoods, showed no change. The entire city is benefiting from the large drop in residential burglary.

Mid-Cambridge still held the highest number of residential burglaries-due to its high population and high population density-but the neighborhood saw its total cut nearly in half. Adjacent Area 4's burglaries dropped more than 50 percent. The Crime Analysis Unit identifies four factors that have led to these incredible all-time lows: the extinction of the professional burglar, gentrification, and the judicious use of police preventive patrols.

Residential Burglaries in 1997


See Residential Burglary Prevention Tips

See Commercial Burglary Prevention Tips

Back to the 1997 Annual Report Index

Back to the CPD Home Page