232 Walden St Property Information
Property Class
CONDO-BLDG
State Class Code
199
Zoning (Unofficial)
C-1
Map/Lot
205-6
Land Area (sq. ft)
5,762
Property Value
Year of Assessment 2026
Tax District R7
Residential Exemption Yes
Building Value Land Value $0
Assessed Value $0
Sale Price $0
Book/Page 9378/340
Sale Date May 26, 1959
Previous Assessed Value $0
Owner Information
Owner(s) LEPORE, ANTHONY J.& FRANCES LEPORE
Building Information
Residential Building Number 1, Section 1 Exterior
Style
Occupancy
Number of Stories 0
Exterior Wall Type
Roof Type
Roof Material
Interior
Living Area (sq. ft.)
Number of Units
0
Total Rooms
0
Bedrooms
0
Kitchens
0
Full Baths
0
Half Baths
0
Fireplaces
0
Systems
Heat Type
Heat Fuel
Central A/C
No
Condition & Grade
Year Built 0
Interior Condition
Overall Condition Overall Grade
Parking
Open Parking 0
Covered Parking 0
Subareas
Code
Description
Gross Area
Living Area
BAS
First Floor
1,176
1,176
DKW
Deck Wood
61
0
FEP
Porch, Enclosed
371
0
FUS
Upper Story, Finished
1,176
1,176
TQS
Three Quarter Story
1,116
837
UBM
Basement
1,176
0
UST
Utility, Storage, Unfinished
25
0
Total:
5,101
3,189
Extra Features / Outbuildings
Description GAR-1.0S
Number of Units 760.00
Unit Type SF
Residential Building Number 2, Section 1 Exterior
Style
Occupancy
Number of Stories 0
Exterior Wall Type
Roof Type
Roof Material
Interior
Living Area (sq. ft.)
Number of Units
0
Total Rooms
0
Bedrooms
0
Kitchens
0
Full Baths
0
Half Baths
0
Fireplaces
0
Systems
Heat Type
Heat Fuel
Central A/C
No
Condition & Grade
Year Built 0
Interior Condition
Overall Condition Overall Grade
Parking
Open Parking 0
Covered Parking 0
Subareas
Code
Description
Gross Area
Living Area
BAS
First Floor
480
480
FBM
Basement, Finished
352
0
FUS
Upper Story, Finished
320
320
UBM
Basement
128
0
Total:
1,280
800
Photos
(Click on a photo to view it at full size)
This page contains much of the information used by the City of Cambridge to assess properties. The purpose of this information is to be used only for ad valorem taxation purposes and any other use is therefore not valid.